5/31/2023 0 Comments Vezer industrial![]() This final meeting spannedĪpproximately sixteen hours during the last two weeks of November 2007 and resulted in an "interim" agreement. Meeting then took place, also at Vezer's California offices, to finalize the necessary arrangements. of those meetings lasted approximately four hours. Of Central Sun, Peter Tagliamonte and Graham Spiers, met with Frank Vezer, President of Vezer, on two occasions at Vezer's offices in Suisun to negotiate the terms of an agreement. Thereafter, in November of 2007, Vezer entered into additional negotiations with Central Sun for the construction of a gold mine located in La Libertad, Nicaragua. 2Ī contract for the purchase of that equipment was subsequently negotiated over a series of email and telephone communiques between Central Sun representatives and Vezer's Suisun offices. Because oral argument was not determined to be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefing. / All further references to "Rule" or "Rules" are to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless otherwise noted. Beginning in June or July of 2007, Vezer was approached by Central Sun Mining ("Central Sun") for the purchase of $1 million worth of equipment owned by Vezer and then located in the State of Nevada. Set forth below, both of B2 Gold's requests will be denied.2ĭefendant Vezer is a California corporation with its permanent place of business located in Suisun, California. That motion seeks dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2).1 B2 GoldĪlternatively seeks dismissal under the common law doctrine of forum non conveniens, contending that an adequate forum for redress exists in either Canada or Nicaragua. B2 Gold, a Canadian company, has now filed the motion The first portion of Vezer subsequently brought the owner of the mine, B2 GoldĬorporation ("B2 Gold"), into this litigation as a third-party defendant. ("Vezer") while working at a Nicaragua mining site whose construction was being managed by Vezer. Plaintiffs seek damages for personal injuries they sustained due to the alleged negligence of a California corporation, Vezer Industrial Professionals, Inc. _/ VEZER INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONALS, INC., VEZER INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONALS, INS., a California Corporation, ORDER RUBEN PEREZ, MICHAEL MOORE, and BRIGETTE MOORE No. PINPOINT HOLDINGS, INC., a corporation B2 GOLD, a Canadian corporation, Third-Party Defendants. Vezer Industrial Professionals, Inc.ġ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. NAME CHANGE: FROM VEZER'S PRECISION INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INC.įor more information, please contact the Secretary of State's Office at 30.Perez et al v. ![]() VEZER'S PRECISION INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Organization InformationĢ382 - Construction - Special Trade Contractors - Building Equipment Contractors (electrical & other wiring, plumbing, heating & air-conditioning, other) If information is missing from this page, it is not in the The West Virginia Secretary of State's database. However, we make no representation or warranty as to the correctness or completeness of the information. NOTICE: The West Virginia Secretary of State's Office makes every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy of information. Home | Login | Print Business Organization Detail
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |